The Tea Party Does Not Practice a Policy of Exclusion

My sister, a very Liberal professor called me tonight to talk about an article in a hallowed major magazine which claimed that the Tea Party is not diverse.Since they came on the scene which I believe was a phenomena that had to happen to prevent this country from going in the wrong direction, they have also been labeled racists and haters of Obama. Absolutely none of this has one iota of truth to it, just the old play on words half sentence psychological warfare aimed at the less studious members of their base who do not bother to quantify what they were being told. The decision at McDonald's and 3M at divestiture of health care last week is a good example of why all of us are in danger pf losing our plans. Sure we can stay on them initially and that is why this promise was a half sentence.The Tea Party is not especially diverse but does not practice any policy of excluding anyone. Black people have no reason to join a party, their political views mesh with the Democratic Party where they have remained and enjoyed political power for a very long time. So why would a Black family leave a political party that they know and has worked for them to join the Tea Party?another half sentence, the Tea Party lacks diversity. Actually there are a good number of Black people that attend Tea Party rallies only to be pounced on by MSM reporters.Bottom line, they want anybody in the Tea Party and everybody is welcome. It is how the Left spins that causes antipathy and confusion. If you like your healthcare you can keep it, required some more pertinent information to be added.

Electing Jerry Brown May Mean That California Is Facing Its Dying Breath

After what Internet contributors viewed as a dirty tricks sting by Jerry Brown and his campaign and high profile gouging lawyer against his adversary, a brilliant and honest CEO with a double digit lead in IQ, Brown, the man who could not defeat a President who was famous for keeping us waiting in 4 hour gas lines is pulling away in the polls. You know why he is? I'll clue you in because I cannot get through his stammering answers. He may actually win because Californians are party people and full of unions who know they are going to cash out when he returns for  the third time after a stint in Oakland as Mayor. The party relies partly to dope which you know is coming in with Jerry and absolutely not with Meg Whitman. Meg Whitman may be too straight for the free thinkers who want to walk around stoned all day. They do not realize that they also will not have jobs and be compelled to go to food banks. Does it make sense to elect a man who has been there and tried the old way, the only way he knows versus a brilliant youthful woman who was CEO of a major corporation. Jerry knows politics. Meg also knows how to raise the bottom line which is better. So if you want to stay at the party vote for the candidate who like most pugilists has stayed at the party far to long. Out of the two candidates don't let your jealousies or emotions get in the way of making California the prosperous state it once was. Meg Whitman is going to get in there and work for California and remember Everybody Must Get Stoned is not a good idea, being in a constant and continuous reverie is not going to do anything positive for Californians.

Where Are We Going With Political Guttersniping

It was clear from the beginning that a fine young woman running for the Senate in Delaware with Tea Party backing had made some curious but proper statements in her youth. Like thousands of others in a failed economy she at one time had some mortgage trouble with the bank, regular stuff in a recession. This young woman had guts and determination, courage and a sound knowledge of politics, having run for office before. Her name is Christine O'Donnell. What gets me is that right out of the shoot, before she had a chance to state her positions in this troubled world, the comedians,MSM and opposing Party started in with the smear campaign. The fact that we are entering an era of thus far permissible nuclear proliferation, created for them the opportuity to display their silliness as they hounded the public and her campaign about a self induced sexual subject. Then they decided to visit acting jobs on cable shows where she made some harmless declarations evidently desired by the show's grooming producers maybe ten years ago.W.C. Fields could not have afforded the public a better comedy act. America has the highest level of poverty in history and unemployment is sky high and no jobs. That is why it was necessary to distract all of us with information that I will say disappeared when Christine reached adulthood and besides nothing she said was improper. The big question is that none of these detractors was as bright and effective and right on top of the issues as the candidate, so they were grasping at straws in a failed attempt to  foul her up with her many supporters.I predict her election.


California is a dead body waiting to be revived by Meg Whitman and even though I am fond of Jerry Brown, I do not think he has the get up and go and has too many political connections to do this job. Meg is a CEO as is Carley Fiorina. That type of speedy thinking and intellectual power and multi-tasking and delegating authority is what California, a terminal patient needs to begin and implement recovery. Meg got slimed too the other day but her reputation and integrity is beyond reproach so things are getting dimmed on this.  It is a shame that any professional would try to jeopardize California and national recovery by implicating Meg Whitman in something she had no part of  and even contemplating throwing off the election.Timing is everything when you are fishing for a big settlement. I think they wanted to get Meg, with deep pockets at a special time when they could throw the bear trap. Did not and will not work. I predict Meg Whitman as the next Governor of California.